Just saw one of the boys make a Facebook post saying that the Rangers are already issuing tickets for not having helmets on in UTV's... Anyone else hear this or see this???

Read the reference got the helmet in the law. It takes you to the vehicle code for helmets (motorcycle law). Just needs to be DOT stickered helmet. Nothing in that law states it has to have a full face, cover ears, etc. just only reference is to DOT.I hope this is not true. Does anyone know if it has to be a full face. or can i just wear a Harly style helmet so i can still run my head sets. This law is bull shit!!
This was another thread going. It'll answer a few questions on this thread....Read the reference got the helmet in the law. It takes you to the vehicle code for helmets (motorcycle law). Just needs to be DOT stickered helmet. Nothing in that law states it has to have a full face, cover ears, etc. just only reference is to DOT.
Even after having read the law I asked Jeff Knoll also about the helmet requirements and he stated his information was DOT or higher in specification. I have just seen it posted more than once and more than on this forum that rumors are spreading about helmet requirements. I say get to know the law do you can intelligently/respectfully communicate with LEO's about the law if need be. It kills me to see false statements made about something as important as this.This was another thread going. It'll answer a few questions on this thread....
Dan...
http://www.utvunderground.com/forum/showthread.php?p=114722#post114722
This will support the law:
![]()
Agree, I refuse to put the helmet on by mandate until 12 am January 1, 2013. Still enjoy the choice while it is there.If was to go to Glamis I wouldn't wear the helmet. If they ticketed me I would remind them of the date the law is in effect, gladly accept it and fight it in court. Rangers are by far the most out of line law enforcement out there, even more so than Fish and Game. They need to be introduced to the 4th amendment from time to time, it really does work.